So, I have just finished reading
tablets 1-12 of the Epic of Gilgamesh, and I’ll say right off the bat going
into the reading I thought I was going to absolutely loathe this text. I have
to say though that I really enjoyed the epic of Gilgamesh. Not only am I thrilled
that this was part of the curriculum for Mosaics, but I feel like I have become
a more knowledgeable person from this ancient text.
Now my
goal for this blog post is to explore a theme that I noticed throughout the
tablets and while there are apparent themes of nature, love and leadership the
theme I want to explore is the Human-like Gods and the God-like humans. The
tale of Gilgamesh features King Gilgamesh who is 2/3 God. He is told to be
God-like in all ways, he is the strongest in the land, he is the ruler and
there is none greater than Gilgamesh. Then there is Gilgamesh’s best friend/adopted
brother Enkidu, who is made by the Gods for Gilgamesh. Enkidu is from the wild
and is strong as a rock and like Gilgamesh in strength. The two are put on high
pedestals and for human beings are made to seem like Gods from their
adventures. Another example of glorifying humans would be Uta-napishti who
survived the Great Deluge and was given immortality by the Gods. Now glorifying
humans is not uncommon in today’s society, for example take a look at
celebrities and athletes, in some cases they seem to be treated like Gods. The
theme I find most interesting is how the Gods are made to seem human-like with
flaws. In the Christian church God is seen as all good and all pure, and everyone
should strive to be better people so they can one day join God in heaven. There
are tales of humans and their faults but never tales of God’s faults. In the
Epic of Gilgamesh there are many Gods that have huge character flaws.
Ishtar,
the daughter of Anu, the goddess of sexual love and war approaches Gilgamesh
and wishes to be his wife. Gilgamesh refuses based on the history of her past
lovers and embarrasses her and ridicules her. In a very human-like way Ishtar
is filled with rage and storms off to daddy asking him to give her permission
to use the bull of heaven to fight Gilgamesh. Now Anu is father of the Gods, so
you would think that Anu would not let a silly thing like that happen because
his daughter is upset, but Anu gives in to Ishtar and grants her the bull of
heaven. Gilgamesh being so God-like
kills the bull of heaven to Ishtar’s dismay. Now let’s examine this, the God
Ishtar is jealous and gets filled with rage when she is rejected just like normal
humans. Anu the father despite knowing that the idea isn’t intelligent, gives
in to his daughter due to her dismay. These do not sound like wonderful traits
of the Gods you worship. I think the most human-like God is by far Enlil. Enlil
is the God who decided for Enkidu to die instead of Gilgamesh even though
Gilgamesh is the one who killed Enlil’s Humbaba and the bull of heaven. Enlil
is always filled with rage and has a short temper. When the Uta-napishti
survives the Great deluge Enlil is furious. Should a God that is worshiped have
such a short temper?
What is
the reasoning behind the human-like Gods and the God-like humans? The writers
of the tablets probably want to show that Gods are not perfect, and obviously
no human is perfect as well. I think the God-like humans are there to inspire
people to be the best they can be and give them a level of perfection that they
can strive for. The human-like Gods are shown to be human like to show that the
Gods don’t have everything together, they are not always making the right
decisions which is why bad things do happen. I think of the saying everything
happens for a reason but I think the writers of the tablets want to show that
sometimes bad things just happen and the Gods aren’t doing it intentionally. I
think the connection between Gods and humans is quite a major theme throughout this
epic and I have am a new found fan of the epic of Gilgamesh.